Your second point is wrong because As far as the Data Protection Act 1998 is concerned, biometric data must be handled in the same way as any other personal data and the same principles apply whether or not it is a photo or a digital code that represents the image.

Thirdly i’m well above the legal drinking age. It’s childish and frankly rather idiotic to assume that the only rejection one might have to such a scheme is because they are underage themselves.

I’m all for protecting our children in society, I’m protecting our children from the illegal and intrusive use of surveillance systems. There exists government sanctioned cards to prove your age, this is a totally unnecessary use of technology to solve a problem that can be solved by diligent checking of ID’s by retailers.

If you think it would speed up the queue at the checkout then you are living in a fantasy realm. Just imagine as you have to wait for the system to come back with it’s check on every individual. It would be far quicker just to ask for some ID in person for those that looked under 21.

It’s better to be honestly evil… or unprincibled.

At least their not getting their lifestyle ideas from Blair and Bush - where kinky torture BDSM, moral laxity, learning to kill people, lie, steal, cheat and be a dick in general are extolled as virtues.

I’ve heard this site is particular good for finding naive teenagers. Although I’ve found it’s best if you ply them with some Crystal meth in return for the sexual favors.

Careful you don’t get a chav though, they tend to be diseased.